April 27th, 2011
jsucus

How Am I Doing - Teacher Evaluation beyond Bubble-In Surveys: Student Engagement

We’re not making an argument against the standard surveys of students assessing teaching performance.  However, the Center has always advocated that faculty desirous of becoming better teachers needed more feedback, earlier and in different forms.  This is the first post in short series highlighting ways for faculty to know how they’re doing as teachers.

1. On a large-ish lecture course I get lots of questions during lecture.  It is actually quite hard to get students to pipe up during a big lecture class. [..] I usually will stop after discussing a difficult concept and ask if there are any questions. They key here is to wait a full minute before proceeding since it is rare that students can both digest what you just said and come up with a question. [..] After a few lectures, if you are lucky, hands simply start popping up at all times without the “awkward minute o’ silence”. Then you know you’ve got ‘em.
2. Lots of people show up to office hours with elaborate questions and what-ifs about the material.  I take showing up to office hours as a sign of being interested enough to make sure you really understand the material. [..] I find that the average office hour visitor is part of the hard-core clique of students that are just curious.
3. Students send unsolicited emails with scientific papers they found and wanted to get my take on them. Or with general more philosophical questions.  Sure, a lot of “studies” the students ask me about are either based on popular press articles or related to some new alternative woo (eg. “Prof, this paper says they found the medical basis of Reiki!”). But you can use this to teach the students how find the primary source material on their own, and to teach them about differentiating science from pseudoscience.
4. After the term is over students send you emails thanking you for the course.
»via Anonymous/Taking It to the Bridge

Of course, items 3-4 are almost as much a barometer of student interest in the course itself as in teaching performance.  We’d expect to see more of this behavior in upper-level courses.  However, the key is really engagement.  At Jackson State, SIRS data over time indicate a strong correlation between high scores in engagement variables and overall rating of the course.  While 3-4 may be too much to ask for in your core course, look for other signs that students are engaging with the content and skills that the course emphasizes.

April 18th, 2011
jsucus

Students as Learners and Teachers: A Different In-Class Evaluation Approach

Students meet weekly with the professor to discuss their in-class observations. One professor kept glancing at a clock directly above the students, making them uncomfortable. Another scribbled illegible notes all over the blackboard, confusing students about what they should write down. Another wanted to encourage a relaxed, discussion-based class by setting up desks in a circle. Instead of sitting on the rim, she stood in the center, becoming the focus of the class and discouraging participation.

The students referenced were not on the roll. Instead they were paid $9.40/hour to sit in on the courses, note their observations and discuss them with the professor throughout the semester.  Students participate in an orientation before beginning their work as consultants.  Faculty volunteer to participate in the program run jointly by Bryn Mawr and Haverford colleges.

» New York Times

September 22nd, 2010
jsucus

Make it easy for reviewers to see how your scores compare to those of your department, your college and the university.  Why?  We’ve noticed distinctive scoring patterns by college.  Some colleges tend to be below university means and others above.  By presenting your data along with that of the department, college and university, you provide context to the reviewers.  Perhaps your mean scores are below those of the university, but are in-stream with the college and better than those of the department.  That’s information reviewers should be able to see at a glance. Similarly, you need to show that your teaching performance has improved over time.  Do so by presenting your mean scores per semester in one printout.

To get started download the Center’s SIRS workbooks by semester.  For the workbooks up to Spring 2007, you’ll need to reference this document [.pdf file] to navigate the departmental codes.  After that semester, the codes are self-explanatory. Then, add your teacher data to the existing comparative worksheets that already show university, college and departmental mean scores or use the existing longitudinal spreadsheets as models to show your progress in teaching performance.

Loading tweets...

@jsucus

Likes

The Center promotes the thoughtful integration of teaching, learning and scholarship at Jackson State University. It encourages faculty research productivity with its research and travel grants and facilitates discussions of faculty development.

 

JSU Center for University Scholars

 

Please direct comments, suggestions and corrections to jsucus@jsums.edu.

 

Following